Market intelligence for international student recruitment from ICEF
3rd Jul 2025

US administration revives proposal to limit terms of student visas

Short on time? Here are the highlights:
  • In 2020, under the first Trump administration, the Department of Homeland Security proposed a substantive rule change to limit the terms for which student visas would be issued
  • The rule would have set a maximum length of four years for F-1 visas, with students from some countries or those in specific programme areas limited to two years
  • The current administration has now signalled its intent to propose a similar rule
  • If passed, the policy would mark a significant departure from the current “duration of status” system in the US

The Trump administration has given notice of a proposed rule change that seeks to limit the term for which a student visa can be issued. If adopted, the new rule would mark a departure from the current "duration of status" approach to issuing student visas in the United States.

"Duration of status" essentially allows foreign students to remain in the US for the duration of their academic programmes so long as they are abiding by the rules of their visa category. The significance of the proposed rule – details of which have not yet been published – is that it would introduce fixed-term limits on new student visas.

The move echoes a similar proposal introduced towards the end of the first Trump administration in 2020. At that time, the intent was to limit F-1 visas to term of the intended programme of study, up to a maximum of four years, after which students would have to apply for a visa extension or a new visa in order to continue their studies in the US.

Under the 2020 proposal, international students from a number of specific countries would have also been limited to a two-year visa term, rather than four years. The two-year visa was proposed for:

  • Students from Iran, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria (all on the State Sponsor of Terrorism List).
  • Students from countries with visa overstay rates of over 10%. Most of the countries with higher visa overstay rates at the time were in Africa (including Nigeria, an important growth market for the US), and some in Asia – including Vietnam and Nepal. Altogether students from dozens of countries would be subject to the two-year visa limit.
  • Students enrolled in Intensive English-language Programmes (IEPs).

That 2020 proposal was controversial and was widely criticised within US higher education. Miriam Feldblum, executive director of the Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, said at the time that the rule would “set arbitrary timelines that do not match how many academic programmes work, and it is creating barriers and uncertainty for international students who are going to wonder, ‘Is the US the right place for me to come?’”

In the end, the proposal was withdrawn by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in June 2021 under the Biden administration.

The new notice – posted on 27 June 2025 and entitled "Establishing a Fixed Time Period of Admission and an Extension of Stay Procedure for Nonimmigrant Academic Students, Exchange Visitors, and Representatives of Foreign Information Media" – signals the current administration's intent to revisit the question.

Where to from here?

Commenting on the new proposal, NAFSA says, "The 'good' news is that it was submitted as a proposed rule, rather than interim final or final rule. Since this is at the proposed rule stage, a rule would not become final until after [DHS] reviews public comments on the proposed rule, submits a final rule for [Office of Management and Budget] review, and then publishes a final rule in the Federal Register with a future effective date."

Writing to DHS in October 2020 on the earlier proposal to establish fixed-term limits for F-1 visas, then-NAFSA CEO Esther Brimmer said, "I urge you to withdraw this poorly conceived rule from consideration."

"If finalised, the rule will foster tremendous uncertainty for many international students and exchange visitors about whether they will be able to maintain their legal status in the United States through the completion of their studies or program.

Under the proposed rule, administering international student and exchange visitor programmes will be far more difficult. The rule also sends a message, not only to international students and exchange visitors but to the world in general, that exceptional talent, work ethic, diverse perspectives, and economic contributions from abroad are not welcome in the United States."

For additional background, please see:

Most Recent

  • Canada and the US are losing international student enrolments to Europe and Asia  Read More
  • Drivers of study abroad in Côte d’Ivoire, Cameroon, and Senegal Read More
  • ICEF Podcast: Live from ICEF Berlin 2025 Read More

Most Popular

  • Which countries will contribute the most to global student mobility in 2030? Read More
  • Research shows link between study abroad and poverty alleviation  Read More
  • Beyond the Big Four: How demand for study abroad is shifting to destinations in Asia and Europe Read More

Because you found this article interesting

Canada and the US are losing international student enrolments to Europe and Asia  Canadian and American universities are struggling amidst government policies meant to curb immigration and/or international student numbers. Meanwhile,...
Read more
Drivers of study abroad in Côte d’Ivoire, Cameroon, and Senegal Last week, we looked at market fundamentals (e.g., GDP, size of the middle class, size of the youth...
Read more
There are more international students in the US than ever in 2025, but commencements are declining The IIE’s 2025 Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange shows that the number of international students in...
Read more
The changing face of international student mobility The following article is adapted from the 2026 edition of ICEF Insights magazine, which is freely available to...
Read more
Australia continues its path towards “managed growth” of international student enrolments with Ministerial Direction 115 A year ago, the Australian government introduced a policy called Ministerial Direction 111 (MD111) with the stated goals...
Read more
Drivers of study abroad in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal, and Vietnam As we move into a new year in international student recruitment, many of us are already deciding upon...
Read more
Why housing will decide Europe’s future as a study destination The following is a guest post contributed by Dr Arunima Dey, research and programme manager at The Class...
Read more
Canada announces new incentives for international recruitment of master’s and PhD students On the heels of this week’s announcement of a significant reduction in Canada’s foreign enrolment cap, Immigration, Refugees...
Read more
What are you looking for?
Quick Links