Market intelligence for international student recruitment from ICEF
3rd Aug 2012

Preferred recruitment strategies of US graduate schools

In March 2012, the US higher education consulting firm Noel-Levitz and The National Association of Graduate Admissions Professionals (NAGAP) conducted an online survey of the recruitment practices of American graduate schools. The survey drew 247 respondents nationwide, including 45 private and 33 public, doctorate-granting institutions as well as 130 private and 39 public, master's institutions. Respondents were asked to rate as many as 80 recruitment practices on a four-point scale: "very effective", "somewhat effective", "minimally effective", and "method not used". Included in the field of 80 recruitment strategies and tactics were ten practices focused specifically on international recruitment. ICEF Monitor has summarised the rating for these in the table below, with the responses broken down by institution type. The table provides a summary value for each strategy or tactic to indicate the percentage of respondents who rated it "very effective" or "somewhat effective". It also provides an accompanying value for each (noted in parentheses) to indicate the percentage of responding institutions reporting they were currently using each method. The table differentiates between those results that are statistically valid and those that are not – results that are not statistically valid due to small sample size are marked with an asterisk throughout. Finally, we have also noted in bold type the top three, statistically valid responses for each category of institution described below. graduate school recruitment table The effectiveness of ten selected methods of international student recruitment as rated by survey respondents, and, in parentheses, the percentage of respondents currently using each method. Source: Noel-Levitz and NAGAP.


There are some interesting observations to be drawn from the Noel-Levitz/NAGAP survey as it pertains to international recruitment.

  • The development of web pages targeted to international students was a consistent top-three response across the four categories of graduate schools in the survey, with roughly half of all respondents actually operating websites targeted to international prospects.
  • Private institutions were more likely to favour sending specialist recruiters on missions abroad than were their public-sector counterparts. However, doctorate-granting institutions responding to the survey, both public and private, were slightly more likely to actually employ this tactic. (We expect there may be a correlation here between the investment of doctoral-granting institutions in this area and their relative commitment to building relationships with embassy and government contacts abroad.)
  • Among the four categories of colleges responding, private, master's-level institutions were most likely to highly rate the use of commissioned representatives abroad, with 76.2% rating this method as either "very effective" or "somewhat effective". However, less than 20% of respondents, across all categories of responding institutions, reported actually using commissioned agents.

This sampling of results reflects a disjunction between the perceived effectiveness of individual recruitment practices and the degree to which those methods were actually employed by the responding institutions. As the study authors note in their introduction:

Many of the top 10 practices (at least three of the 10 for each sector examined) were not being used by a significant portion of the poll respondents, sometimes more than half... A significant percentage of respondents across institution types, up to 75 percent, reported using practices that most respondents of their type judged to be “minimally effective,” with the most commonly-rated such practice for doctorate-granting institutions being local television and radio advertising.

These broader observations point to one of the useful applications of the survey itself in that individual institutions can use it as a reference point for evaluating or benchmarking their current mix of recruitment strategies and tactics. In this respect, the survey is also a very useful series of admissions metrics, including such measures as "conversion rate from inquiry to application" and "yield rate from admission to enrollment" that many institutions will find helpful for benchmarking performance across prospect management and admissions systems. The complete benchmark study is available online as is a special appendix that provides additional, detailed findings for international recruitment practices. Sources: Noel-Levitz, NAGAP

Most Recent

  • How is Indian student mobility changing in 2023? Read More
  • Move Over Google: Social media is also a search engine Read More
  • Why managing digital shock needs to be part of your student support plan Read More

Most Popular

  • Canada’s foreign enrolment grew by more than 30% in 2022 Read More
  • Measuring cost of study and cost of living across study destinations Read More
  • Recruiting in the Emirates: Big goals, world-class education, and new scholarships Read More

Because you found this article interesting

How is Indian student mobility changing in 2023? The shape of outbound mobility from India has changed over the course of 2023, with the UK and...
Read more
Move Over Google: Social media is also a search engine The following feature is adapted from the 2024 edition of ICEF Insights magazine. The digital edition of the...
Read more
International enrolment in Canadian K-12 recovered to more than 80% of pre-pandemic levels in 2022/23 Canada’s K-12 public schools enrolled just over 33,000 foreign students in 2022/23. That total includes nearly 29,000 in...
Read more
Impact of UK’s dependant visa policy shows as nearly half of business schools miss targets In what appears to be an early signal of the impact of an important change to UK visa...
Read more
US: New coalition pushes for coordinated national strategy for international education Of the leading destinations for study abroad, only the US does not have an official international education strategy....
Read more
US international enrolment passed pre-pandemic levels for “near record high” in 2022/23 The number of international students in US higher education in 2022/23 exceeded 1 million and increased year-over-year by...
Read more
AI is here…Are you ready? The following feature is adapted from the 2024 edition of ICEF Insights magazine. The digital edition of the...
Read more
Spending by Indian outbound students could reach US$70 billion by 2025 Direct spending on study abroad by Indian students has been pegged at US$47 billion for 2022. That figure...
Read more
What are you looking for?
Quick Links